top of page

Estranged Daughter Successfully Claims Family Provision: Kemperman v Antonenas Case Study

  • Writer: Justeen Dormer
    Justeen Dormer
  • Feb 28, 2022
  • 3 min read

Updated: Mar 30

Family Provision Claims



When a family member feels they have been unfairly left out of a will or inadequately provided for, they may have grounds for a family provision claim under Chapter 3 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). This case demonstrates how the courts balance family relationships, estrangement, and financial need when determining adequate provision.



Estranged Daughter Successfully Claims Family Provision: Kemperman v Antonenas Case Study


Case Overview:  Kemperman v Antonenas [2021] NSWSC 1555


Estate Value:  $1,591,707

Deceased:  Johanna Antonia Kemperman (died 2019, aged 88)

Presiding Judge:  Hallen J

Claimants:  Three adult children seeking family provision orders


The Family Dynamics


The case involved three sisters - Antonia (the plaintiff), Mary, and Cecelia (defendants) - competing for their share of their mother's estate.  What made this case particularly complex was the 50-year estrangement between Antonia and her mother.



Key Issues Examined by the Court


1.  Estrangement and Its Impact on Inheritance Rights


The deceased had expressed her disappointment in a letter attached to the will, stating she left only $50,000 to Antonia due to her "lack of care and understanding throughout her life." However, estrangement alone does not automatically disqualify someone from receiving adequate provision.


2.  Allegations of Family Violence


Antonia claimed she was a victim of:

  • Physical violence from both parents

  • Regular physical punishment for minor rule infractions

  • Psychological and emotional abuse

  • Sexual assault (which she later denied)


These allegations were disputed by her sisters, who were unaware of any violence until the family provision claim was filed.


3.  Financial Need and Circumstances


  • Antonia's Financial Position:

  • Age 66 with no earning capacity

  • Receiving disability pension since 2002

  • Living in community housing

  • Suffering from autoimmune disorders including neurological conditions and Sjögren's syndrome

  • Estimated medical expenses of $200,000

  • NDIS participant


The Court's Decision


Original Will Provision


  • Antonia:  $50,000 plus a violin

  • Other beneficiaries:  Remainder of the estate


Court-Ordered Provision


The court awarded Antonia $170,000 (approximately 15% of the estate), representing one-quarter of the value of the parents' Lisarow property.



Legal Principles Applied


Factors Considered by the Court


  1. Financial need of the applicant

  2. Size of the estate and ability to provide for all beneficiaries

  3. Relationship with the deceased and reasons for estrangement

  4. Competing claims from other beneficiaries

  5. Moral duty of the deceased to provide adequate maintenance


Why the Claim Succeeded


Despite the long estrangement, the court recognised:

  • Antonia's genuine financial hardship and medical needs

  • The estate was large enough to provide additional support without substantially affecting other beneficiaries

  • Neither of the other sisters demonstrated pressing financial need

  • The moral obligation to provide for a child's proper maintenance and advancement in life



Key Takeaways for Family Provision Claims


Estrangement Doesn't Equal Exclusion


Even decades of estrangement doesn't automatically justify inadequate provision if the applicant can demonstrate genuine financial need.


Financial Need is Paramount


Courts will consider:

  • Current financial circumstances

  • Future earning capacity

  • Health and medical expenses

  • Housing needs

  • Overall quality of life requirements


Estate Size Matters

The court will assess whether the estate can accommodate additional provision without unfairly disadvantaging other beneficiaries.



Do You Have a Family Provision Claim?


If you believe you've been inadequately provided for in a will, you may have grounds for a family provision claim.  Time limits apply - generally 12 months from the date of death for NSW claims.



Common Scenarios Include:


  • Estranged children left with minimal or no provision

  • Second spouses excluded in favour of children from first marriages

  • Dependent children who received unequal treatment

  • Family members who provided care but received no recognition



Need Legal Guidance?


Family provision claims involve complex legal and emotional considerations.  At Dormer Stanhope, we understand the sensitive nature of these disputes and provide compassionate, clear guidance through every step of the process.


Contact us today for a confidential consultation about your family provision rights.  We offer affordable legal solutions designed to achieve fair outcomes while minimising family conflict.




bottom of page